Pedagogía Fem-Crit en el Interregno:
resistencia en la Lucha por la Igualdad de Género y la Diversidad Sexual
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58238/igal.v5i1.124Palavras-chave:
pedagogía, fem-crit, interregno, hegemonía, educación jur´ídica, igualdad de género, diversidad sexual, LGBTQIA+Resumo
Este artículo es una reflexión sobre cómo la pedagogía Fem-Crit puede servir como herramienta de resistencia ante la actual crisis orgánica, o interregno, en la lucha por la igualdad de género y la diversidad sexual. En primer lugar, se explica el marco didáctico de la pedagogía Fem-Crit. Luego se explica cómo el interregno actual es un punto de inflexión que puede representar una regresión a un estado de derecho de mayor subordinación o la evolución a un marco jurídico más igualitario. A partir del entendimiento de esta coyuntura, se propone una reformulación de la enseñanza jurídica dentro del marco Fem-Crit que trascienda el análisis crítico del derecho y se convierta en una práctica de resistencia y transformadora. Para ello, se plantea que esta pedagogía debe fomentar la organización política, reconstruir la cohesión de los movimientos feministas y LGBTQIA+ para poder combatir efectivamente no solo los síntomas mórbidos del interregno, sino también para colocar la lucha contrahegemónica en una posición ganadora.
Downloads
Referências
Abrams, J. R. (2021). Legal education’s curricular tipping point. Hofstra Law Review, 49, 897–915.
Babic, M. (2020). Let’s talk about the interregnum: Gramsci and the crisis of the liberal world order. International Affairs, 96, 767–772.
Chamallas, M. E. (2003). Introduction to feminist legal theory (2nd ed.). Icaria / Abya-Yala.
Darling-Hammond, S., & Holmquist, K. (2015). Creating wise classrooms to empower diverse law students: Lessons in pedagogy from transformative law professors. Berkeley La Raza Law Journal, 25, 23–27.
Esquirol, J. L. (2021). Making the critical moves: A top ten in progressive legal scholarship. University of Colorado Law Review, 92, 1079–1091.
Filippini, M. (2017). Using Gramsci: A new approach (P. J. Barr, Trans.). Pluto Press.
Freedman, A. E. (1990). Feminist legal method in action: Challenging racism, sexism, and homophobia in law school. Georgia Law Review, 24, 849–864.
George, M.-A. (2021). Expanding LGBT. Florida Law Review, 73, 243–278.
Gonçalves, W. I., Jr. (2021). Outsider public defenders as organic intellectuals. Berkeley La Raza Law Journal, 32, 1–13.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. Nowell-Smith, Eds. & Trans.). Lawrence & Wishart. (Original work Quaderni del carcere).
Harker, Y. S. (2016). Legal information for social justice: The new ACRL framework and critical information literacy. Legal Information Review, 2, 19–24.
Holst, J. D., & Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Catharsis: Antonio Gramsci, pedagogy, and the political independence of the working class. In N.
Pizzolato & J. D. Holst (Eds.), Antonio Gramsci: A pedagogy to change the world (pp. 211–228). Springer.
Kapur, R., & Mahmud, T. (2000). Hegemony, coercion, and their teeth-gritting harmony: A commentary on power, culture, and sexuality in Franco’s Spain. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 33, 411–412.
Katz, S., & Haldar, D. (2016). The pedagogy of trauma-informed lawyering. Clinical Law Review, 22, 359–396.
Kothari, A., Salleh, A., Escobar, A., Demaría, F., & Acosta, A. (Eds.). (2019). Pluriverso: Un diccionario del posdesarrollo. Icaria / Abya-Yala.
Marshall, D. G. (2005). Socratic method and the irreducible core of legal education. Minnesota Law Review, 90, 1–12.
McNamarah, C. T. (2023). Cis-woman-protective arguments. Columbia Law Review, 123, 845–907.
McPhaul, J. (2021a, May 11). Noticel obtains leaked audio from Ruiz Costas case. San Juan Daily Star. https://www.sanjuandailystar.com/post/noticelobtains-leaked-audio-from-ruiz-costas-case.
McPhaul, J. (2021b, May 12). Pierluisi: System failed Andrea Ruiz Costas. San Juan Daily Star. https://www.sanjuandailystar.com/post/pierluisi-systemfailed-andrea-ruiz-costas.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1988). Feminist legal theory, critical legal studies, and legal education or “The Fem-Crits go to law school”. Journal of Legal Education, 38, 61–78.
Mertz, E. (1992). Linguistic ideology and praxis in U.S. law school classrooms. Journal of Pragmatics, 2, 325–345.
Noticel. (2021, May 10). Audio vista 26 de marzo 2021 Regla 6 caso Andrea Ruiz ante jueza Ingrid Alvarado Tribunal de Caguas [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/VlSJPLbZhE8.
Pouwels, J. (2019). We are in need of each other: Paulo Freire and the role of conflicts in education. International Journal of Social Pedagogy, 7(1), 1–4.
Preston, C. B. (1993). Joining traditional values and feminist legal scholarship. Journal of Legal Education, 43, 511–530.
Proctor, P. (2004). Towards mythos and mythology: Applying a feminist critique to legal education to effectuate a socialization of both sexes in law school classrooms. Cardozo Women’s Law Journal, 10, 577–594.
Ramos, V., Jr. (1982). The concepts of ideology, hegemony, and organic intellectuals in Gramsci’s Marxism. Theoretical Review. https://www.marxists.org/history/erol/periodicals/theoretical-review/1982301.htm.
Rosario Lebrón, A. (2013). For better and for better: The case for abolishing civil marriage. Washington University Jurisprudence Review, 5, 189–231.
Rosario Lebrón, A. (2015). If these blackboards could talk: The Crit classroom, a battlefield. Charleston Law Review, 9, 305–330.
Rosario Lebrón, A. (2021). The ouroboros of identity politics. Tulane Journal of Law & Sexuality, 30, 131–150.
Rosario Lebrón, A. (2022). If these blackboards could talk 2: The feminist-Crit classroom. Family Court Review, 60, 793–810.
Rosario Lebrón, A. (2025a). Between the pessimism of state action and the optimism of SSOGIE equality. Southwestern Law Review, 53, 303–320.
Rosario Lebrón, A. (2025b). The comorbidities of SSOGIE equality: A crisis lens to understanding its future. Northern Kentucky Law Review, 52, 39–58.
Rossa, L. (2019, August 17). I’m a Black feminist. I think call-out culture is toxic. The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/17/opinion/sunday/cancel-culture-call-out.html.
Williams, G. (1960). The concept of “egemonia” in the thought of Antonio Gramsci: Some notes on interpretation. Journal of the History of Ideas, 21, 586–591.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 - Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivativos 4.0 Internacional
Esta licença exige que os reutilizadores dêem crédito ao criador. Permite que os reutilizadores copiem e distribuam o material em qualquer meio ou formato, de forma não adaptada e apenas para fins não comerciais.
- BY: O crédito deve ser dado a você, o criador.
- NC: Somente o uso não comercial do seu trabalho é permitido. Não comercial significa que não se destina principalmente ou é direcionado a vantagens comerciais ou compensação monetária.
- ND: Não são permitidas derivações ou adaptações do seu trabalho.
